The average annual total returns for Selected American Shares Class S for periods ending June 30, 2023 are: 1 year, 21.54%; 5 years, 6.56%; and 10 years, 9.36%. The performance presented represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future results.Total return assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gain distributions. Investment return and principal value will vary so that, when redeemed, an investor’s shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. For most recent month-end performance, click here or call 800-243-1575. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. The total annual operating expense ratio for Class S shares as of the most recent prospectus was 0.99%. The total annual operating expense ratio may vary in future years. Returns and expenses for other classes of shares will vary.

Selected American Shares (SAS) returned 18.52% in the first-half ended June 30, 2023, and has grown wealth for shareholders in all periods since its inception. Figure 1 shows that the longer a shareholder has stayed with us the more their savings grew.

As Figure 2 indicates, the value of $10,000 invested with us has grown steadily the longer a shareholder has stayed with us. For those who began this journey with us since we took over management of Selected American Shares on May 1, 1993, that same $10,000 is now worth over $150,000, almost eight times the amount the investor would have received sitting on the sidelines earning the risk-free rate.

The fund’s recent outperformance coincides with the burst of the easy-money bubble that began during the financial crisis and accelerated during the pandemic. Through this unprecedented period, the cost of money as measured by long-term interest rates fell to the lowest level in recorded history as shown in Figure 3. In turn, this created enormous financial distortions, the consequences of which are only now becoming broadly apparent.

Near-zero interest rates fueled high leverage; provided cheap capital for speculative business models; led to absurdly high valuations for remote earnings potential and provided easy funding for companies that promised to disrupt whole sectors of the economy. As Figure 4 summarizes, this environment rewarded just the sort of business models we tend to avoid because they’re too risky or too overvalued.

On the other side of the ledger, the speculative frenzy caused by free money led to many companies being relatively undervalued. This includes businesses with attributes like conservative balance sheets, proven long-term business models, a return-on-capital mindset and expense discipline, which are central to our long-term investment discipline. Furthermore, with rates near zero, earnings of financial firms that rely on interest income—e.g., banks and insurers—were thwarted³ and current cash flow and dividends became undervalued relative to future promises.

In short, during this decade of distortion, the durable and resilient economic fundamentals of our portfolio companies fell out of fashion. Their fall from favor was reflected in declining relative valuations despite their sound fundamentals. In Figure 5, the rising green line shows the average earnings over the past decade of the top-15 holdings in our portfolio today, which represent more than 70% of the portfolio. The falling red line shows the declining valuations that the market placed on these reliable but unspectacular growth companies.

For us, falling valuations and improving fundamentals spell opportunity. As Warren Buffett famously said, “In the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.” For more than a decade, our portfolio companies have increased their earnings and become more valuable. With the distortions of the free money era ending, we are encouraged that the fund’s results are beginning to reflect the growing value of our portfolio holdings.

While absolute and relative results over the past year have been strong, the portfolio remains significantly undervalued when compared to the market averages. Figure 6 indicates that the carefully selected group of companies that comprise Selected American Shares portfolio trade at only 11 times forward earnings—an almost 45% discount to the S&P 500 Index—despite having grown their earnings per share significantly faster over the past five years. This rare combination of above-average growth and below-average prices is a value investor’s dream that positions us well for the years ahead.

While businesses with decent past records might be expected to trade at low valuations if they face secular challenges or a bleak future, the opposite should be true for the companies in Selected American Shares, which we believe will earn significantly more in the years ahead. We believe the select companies we own have durable competitive advantages and bright prospects.

Today’s deteriorating macroeconomic outlook has led some commentators and pundits to advise selling out of stocks and waiting until economic prospects improve. History teaches us that such market timing is a fool’s errand. As famed investor Peter Lynch observed, “Far more money has been lost by investors in preparing for corrections or anticipating corrections than has been lost in the corrections themselves.” Corrections are an inevitable but unpredictable part of the investment landscape. Figure 7 shows that on average the market corrects 5% three times per year, 10% once per year and 20% every 3.5 years.

Like market corrections, economic recessions are also an inevitable albeit somewhat less frequent occurrence. In fact, we have navigated through three recessions since the year 2000. More importantly, even if investors had perfect foresight and were able to sit out all recessions, their returns would have been worse, not better, than if they had simply stayed the course.

Figure 8 confirms that if an investor had been able to sell one year before and get back in one year after every economic downturn since 1928, their results would be worse than if they had remained invested.

Knowing that corrections and downturns are unpredictable but inevitable, we prioritize resilience as well as long-term growth potential in our portfolio companies. Importantly, this does not mean that we expect our companies to earn more each year, but rather that we expect earnings power and intrinsic value to compound at a good rate over the long term. With a near recession in the offing, many pundits, strategists and commentators are advising investors to prioritize the short-term predictability of consumer discretionary and consumer staple companies whose slow-growing businesses tend to be less economically sensitive. The problem is that paying a high price for predictable but slow growth can be a recipe for long-term disappointment. It is remarkable that these two relatively slow-growing sectors currently trade at an eye-popping 26 times and 20 times forward earnings, respectively.⁸

By paying high valuations for smooth earnings, investors forget that even a good business can be a bad investment if purchased at an irrational price. Like Warren Buffett—“We prefer a lumpy 15% return to a smooth 12% return”—and thus focus on long-term rather than linear growth. In today’s environment, we are avoiding overvalued perceived safety and targeting companies with widening competitive positions, ‘lumpy’ growth, significant free cash flow, long-lived assets and durability.

Bearing in mind John Train’s wisdom that “investing is the art of the specific,” we now turn to a detailed review of the themes, sectors and companies that position us to take advantage of the current environment of uncertainty.

Financials—Growth Stocks in Disguise

The financial sector makes up the largest weighting in Selected American Shares—reflecting our belief that since the great financial crisis of 2008–2009, investors have significantly undervalued financial companies in general and banks in particular. This undervaluation stems from the scars of that crisis and a failure to appreciate that stricter regulations and significantly more capital have made select well-managed large banks far safer and more attractive than ever.

Earlier this year, the importance of the terms “well-managed” and “large” was reinforced by the collapse of three smaller and riskier institutions, Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank and First Republic Bank. We owned none of these, not because we hadn’t studied them over the years but rather because our review of their balance sheets showed an interest rate mismatch between their assets (securities and loans) and their liabilities (customer deposits).

While we did not predict their collapse, we predicted that they had taken unnecessary risks that would significantly dampen their future earnings power, a clear indication of an aggressive, short-term culture. For example, in a 2022 research memo, we wrote, “At First Republic, [we are] rather startled by their choices. It’s not just that their assets are largely locked into fixed rates, but also that… [we] believe their deposit base is going to be far more rate sensitive than that of a traditional regional bank.”

The collapse of these three poorly managed banks created a panic. While the prices of virtually all banks declined sharply, the value of the large, high-quality banks we own actually increased throughout this period. Despite blaring headlines about bank runs, most of our carefully selected banks are adding new customers and growing profits. Today, their capital ratios are at or near all-time highs; they have benefited from higher interest rates, and most importantly, in July of this year, all passed the stringent stress test overseen by the Federal Reserve.

This stress test models a dramatic recession—one meaningfully worse than the great financial crisis of 2008–2009. It includes a 3.5% decline in gross domestic product, a 10% unemployment rate, a 37% decline in residential real estate, a 40% decline in commercial real estate and a 55% decline in the stock market. The resilience and strength required to weather such an economic storm combined with proven economies of scale in branding and technology should drive SAS market share gains and growth for years to come. Trading at some of the lowest valuations in the market, our financial sector holdings—such as Capital One Financial, Wells Fargo, Bank of New York Mellon, JP Morgan Chase and U.S. Bancorp—deserve to be revalued upwards over time. In the meantime, increasing dividends and a shrinking share base create value while we wait.

Durable Industrials—Nonlinear Growth

As concern about a looming recession has grown, we have found opportunities in long-term growth companies whose short-term earnings could be affected by an economic downturn. While investors are paying a premium for slow-growing companies that are not economically sensitive in the short term, they are undervaluing companies whose long-term earnings power will grow more substantially over time. As discussed above, the tendency to overweight the pattern of earnings relative to the amount of earnings reflects psychology rather than economics. In today’s market, nervous investors are essentially paying twice as much for a hypothetical business that will earn $10 million, $10.5 million, and $11 million over the next three years than one that will earn $10 million, $9 million, and $13 million even though the second one is worth more. Examples in our portfolio of resilient but nonlinear growth companies with long-lived assets and strong competitive positions include Berkshire Hathaway, Applied Materials, Teck Resources, Samsung and Owens Corning.

Healthcare—Finding Value in a Growth Sector

The healthcare industry has been a growing part of the U.S. economy for decades. As a result, many companies in this sector trade at high valuations reflecting their robust but well-known reputation for growth. For value-conscious investors like us, investing in healthcare requires looking beyond the obvious to identify businesses that have exposure to this growth industry but which trade at low prices. Furthermore, recognizing that the constantly rising cost of healthcare cannot go on forever, we have been particularly drawn to companies whose products or services play some role in managing or reducing the cost of care. As a result, we have positions in Cigna Group, a well-regarded provider of managed care, Viatris, a leading manufacturer of low-cost branded generic drugs and Quest Diagnostics, whose centralized facilities provide diagnostic medical tests at a fraction of the cost of hospitals’ in-house labs.

Online Platforms—Controversial Blue Chips

For many years, we have referred to the leading online platforms such as Alphabet, Meta and Amazon as the blue chips of tomorrow. Their economies of scale, network effects, strong competitive positions and profitable business models combine to make them some of the best businesses we have ever seen. Because of this success, these juggernauts have attracted waves of regulatory scrutiny and relentless negative press coverage. As a result of the ebb and flow of these controversies, investor sentiment can swing precipitously from euphoria to disgust, which can provide opportunities for price-conscious investors.

For example, in our last report, we included a detailed review of our investment in Meta, the holding company that includes Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, whose shares had recently plunged. We wrote, “Meta currently languishes under a cloud of skepticism… Down more than 65% from its high, we believe all of the risks to be more than discounted and have added to our holding.” Since then, Meta shares have soared more than 100%.

While we are not short-term traders, the enormous price volatility of these online tech leaders has led us to be opportunistic, trimming when prices are high and adding when they are low. Recently, as these companies have swung back into favor, we have trimmed our holdings in both Meta and Alphabet. We have also added to our position in IAC, a lesser-known, but spectacularly well-managed tech and media holding company. IAC created and spun out companies such as Expedia and Match and currently owns Home Advisor, Angi, Dotdash Meredith (Investopedia, People) and a range of smaller internet and media properties as well as owning a significant stake in MGM Resorts.

Select International Leaders— Economics Trumps Geography

Finally, because the U.S. stock market has outperformed virtually all international markets over the past decade or more, many investors have given up on international investing and chosen to ignore all companies whose shares trade outside of the U.S. As a result, select companies whose business results, competitive positions and management quality would lead investors to pay a premium if the shares were listed in the United States trade at steep discounts, even allowing for regulatory differences and currency exposure. In each of these investments, our focus is on durability, quality, valuation and management. Examples include DBS, the largest bank in Singapore (also known as the Fort Knox of Asia), Danske Bank, the leading bank of Denmark for more than a century, and Ping An, the largest insurance company in Asia, whose name literally translates as “Safe and Well.”

The past-12 months mark a complete change in market fundamentals as we move from an era of record-low interest rates and speculative bubbles to a period of higher inflation and recessionary fears. While transitions can be volatile, this transformation represents a long overdue return to normalcy after a decade in which the suppression of interest rates inflated asset prices, rewarded speculation and devalued economic fundamentals. Until roughly one year ago, our focus on durability, resilience and valuation left us out of the hottest areas of the market. Though we grew the value of the assets entrusted to our stewardship, we lagged the indices. However, as the bubble has deflated, our steadfast focus on fundamentals has paid off; the fund is generating strong absolute and relative returns. We are encouraged by this start, but we caution that short-term results are unpredictable and corrections and recessions though painful are inevitable. Instead of trying to predict the timing of such setbacks, we prepare for them by owning companies that can make strong progress in good times and endure through hard times.

During the past decade of excess, we built a portfolio to ride out the inevitable return to reality. In the years ahead, we expect that our value-investing discipline and patience will be rewarded.

Above all, we never forget that we are stewards of our shareholders’ savings and that our most important job is growing the value of the funds entrusted to us. With more than $2 billion of our own money invested alongside that of our clients, we are on this journey together.⁹ That we stand by our portfolio of carefully selected companies is more than just words. Given that 85% of all funds are overseen by managers who have less than $1 million invested in tandem with their clients, our alignment with shareholders is an uncommon advantage. While we do not welcome the pessimism and fear that have characterized our world recently, we are well-prepared for it and, more importantly, we are poised for the future.

Thank you for the trust you have placed in us.